In
this commentary I will be reflecting upon the session were we created a keyring
using the application Adobe illustrator. I will attempt to explain what the
application is, how is was used, the challenges I faced within this lesson and
try to link this to theory within education.
Mark started the lesson by stating he had a task he wanted the class to complete. The software he wanted us to use was Adobe illustrator, this is a graphic design software used to produce logos, graphics, posters, keyrings etc.
Mark gave his instructions on what was to be done very quickly, I had a note book and pen out before he started his instruction, I attempted to make notes quickly on the task at hand; this was hard to process the instructions and see what he was doing on the screen, this caused a misunderstanding of what to do which made me feel frustrated, confused and annoyed. This was not Mark`s usual style of teaching, this appeared to take on a behaviourist approach to teaching in the sense I felt it was a style of ‘learning without understanding and skills acquired in this way could not be transferred to other situations` (Lacey, 1996). This was a new application or software that I was unfamiliar with, I had never used this before, so this was very overwhelming, at one point during this task I was that frustrated that I did not know what I was supposed to be doing I felt like giving up on the task all together. Eventually Mark went over the task again, this time it felt like a more constructivist approach based on the fact the whole class had a small amount of knowledge surrounding the software, we as a whole class could now build upon the already acquired knowledge and begin to engage with the lesson objectives better. Ausubel states that ‘The most important factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach accordingly` (Matheson, 2008, p. 46). So Mark understood that we did not grasp the concept of the lesson from the instructions at the beginning of the lesson, he than re-evaluated and went through the instructions again, once some of the students grasp what was acquired to do, they became the more knowledgeable others and aided other class members to complete the task. Vygotsky believed that students constructed their own knowledge but put emphasis on the social aspect of construction, ‘he claimed that interaction with an adult or more competent peer was crucial…` (Moylett, 2003, p. 30) within learning, he labelled these more competent peers or adults as more knowledgeable others (MKO).
Once
the whole class had completed the task set on Adobe illustrator we got to
produce what we had designed, this being a keyring with our names on. We
produced this with the help of another tutor on the forth floor, using a laser
cutter. This tutor produced art using laser cutting which was very interesting.
The class took it in turns in small groups to go to produce their keyrings, the
tutor guided us through the process, although we did not actually physically
use the laser cutter, she talked us through each step as she performed it. This
part of the lesson seemed somewhat of a reward after the confusion and
struggles we had as a whole class at the beginning of the lesson.
I
found this lesson to be a drastic style of teaching, which I was unfamiliar and
uncomfortable with. Personally, I found that this style of teaching method did
not work for my style of learning and it would appear it also did not work for
the rest of the class. I felt the individual needs and learning styles of
individuals was not met or considered when this lesson was planned. The tutor
had one task he wanted to be completed and that was that, although I know the
aim of this teaching style was to enlighten students on the different teaching
styles that are taught throughout the education system, it was still somewhat
frustrating. Tutors need to use a variety of teaching styles in all lessons as
to attempt to meet the classes individual learning styles, although this can be
very difficult for the tutor to actually achieve as students learn at different
paces and depending on their level of prior knowledge of the topic; the tutor
may need to start at a basic level.
References
Lacey, M. C.
(1996). Interactive Approaches to Teaching. London: David Fulton.
Matheson, D.
(2008). An Introduction to the Study of Education (Third ed.). Oxon:
Routledge.
Moylett, H. (2003). Education Studies ESSENTIAL ISSUES. London: SAGE.